The University of Sheffield
Browse
DOCUMENT
1 Smart screens.pdf (127.4 kB)
DOCUMENT
2 Social media.pdf (142.39 kB)
DOCUMENT
3 Care management software.pdf (142.85 kB)
DOCUMENT
4 Banking and Shopping apps.pdf (134.49 kB)
DOCUMENT
5 Barrier alarms.pdf (145.67 kB)
DOCUMENT
6 Care cameras.pdf (139.1 kB)
DOCUMENT
7 Stationary personal alarms.pdf (143.71 kB)
DOCUMENT
8 Automatic switch-offs.pdf (145.7 kB)
DOCUMENT
9 Wearable hydration reminders.pdf (131.89 kB)
DOCUMENT
10 Emergency information storage device.pdf (145.09 kB)
DOCUMENT
11 Smart speakers.pdf (140.68 kB)
DOCUMENT
12 Online training programmes for carers .pdf (130.85 kB)
DOCUMENT
13 Personnel management software.pdf (126.93 kB)
DOCUMENT
14 Missing person app.pdf (124.83 kB)
DOCUMENT
15 Aromatic Oil diffusers.pdf (133.46 kB)
DOCUMENT
16 Fridge cameras.pdf (127.33 kB)
DOCUMENT
17 Social robots.pdf (140.13 kB)
DOCUMENT
18 Environmental hazard detectors.pdf (133.63 kB)
DOCUMENT
19 Stationary hydration reminder.pdf (128.18 kB)
DOCUMENT
20 Automatic toilets.pdf (129.04 kB)
1/0
84 files

Technologies to support working dementia carers: Stakeholders perspectives from a custom-built co-design website

dataset
posted on 2022-04-12, 10:31 authored by Alice Spann, Luc de Witte, Mark HawleyMark Hawley, Marieke Spreeuwenberg

The views of working dementia carers and other relevant stakeholders (people with dementia, care workers, employers, etc.) on technologies to help carers better reconcile work and care were sought via a custom-built co-design website. The technologies (n=83) were previously identified based on working dementia carers' expressed needs and wants regarding technological solutions for their work-care reconciliation challenges and presented to participants in a blog-style format. Participants were asked to comment on these technology blog posts (i.e., how useful they thought they could be for working carers, how they thought the technology would affect them personally, whether they had ideas for improvements, etc.) and rate how much they liked the idea of the technology on a scale from 1 (min) to 5 (max). Each data file represents one of the 83 technology blog posts and is structured as follows: 1) description of the technology, 2) participants' comments, 3) participants' rating, 4) participant ID, 5) date and time of entry. An additional file details which stakeholder group participants belonged to.


The research received ethical approval from the ScHARR (School of Health and Related Research) Research Ethics Committee at the University of Sheffield (Reference 022994).

History

Ethics

  • The project has ethical approval and the number is included in the description field

Policy

  • The data complies with the institution and funders' policies on access and sharing

Sharing and access restrictions

  • The data can be shared openly

Data description

  • The file formats are open or commonly used

Methodology, headings and units

  • Headings and units are explained in the files

Usage metrics

    School of Health and Related Research

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC