The University of Sheffield
Browse
.BMP
Scan5_rec0912.bmp (130.5 kB)
.BMP
Scan5_rec0913.bmp (130.5 kB)
.BMP
Scan5_rec0914.bmp (130.5 kB)
.BMP
Scan5_rec0915.bmp (130.5 kB)
.BMP
Scan5_rec0916.bmp (130.5 kB)
.BMP
Scan5_rec0917.bmp (130.5 kB)
.BMP
Scan5_rec0918.bmp (130.5 kB)
.BMP
Scan5_rec0919.bmp (130.5 kB)
.BMP
Scan5_rec0920.bmp (130.5 kB)
.BMP
Scan5_rec0921.bmp (130.5 kB)
.BMP
Scan5_rec0922.bmp (130.5 kB)
.BMP
Scan5_rec0923.bmp (130.5 kB)
.BMP
Scan5_rec0924.bmp (130.5 kB)
.BMP
Scan5_rec0925.bmp (130.5 kB)
.BMP
Scan5_rec0926.bmp (130.5 kB)
.BMP
Scan5_rec0927.bmp (130.5 kB)
.BMP
Scan5_rec0928.bmp (130.5 kB)
.BMP
Scan5_rec0929.bmp (130.5 kB)
.BMP
Scan5_rec0930.bmp (130.5 kB)
.BMP
Scan5_rec0931.bmp (130.5 kB)
1/0
500 files

Integrating particle tracking with computational fluid dynamics to assess haemodynamic perturbation by coronary artery stents- CHROMA STENT MICRO-CT

figure
posted on 2022-05-21, 11:05 authored by Cecile PerraultCecile Perrault, Luke BoldockLuke Boldock, Paul Evans, Alberto MarzoAlberto Marzo

test

µCT scans were performed with a SkyScan 1172 high-resolution desktop µCT scanner (Bruker). Stented vessels (with or without contrast agent) and casts were secured to an 8 mm diameter rotating stage within the machine with double-sided tape, oriented vertically (Figure 2.6A). The x-ray source was turned on and control software was opened to provide a live image via an 11 megapixel x-ray camera, as well as the means to alter scan parameters: voltage, current, resolution, the use of aluminium filters, etc.

The vertical position of the stage, the camera pixel size (large, 1000 x 500; medium, 2000 x 1000; small, 4000 x 2000) and the proximity of the camera to the sample were set to maximise resolution while ensuring that the region of interest (i.e. the full length of the stent or cast) remained within the field of view. When the sample extended beyond the widest field of view (typically models containing stents longer than 13 mm) multiple oversize scans were performed. The stage, being metallic, was always kept outside of the field of view to reduce interference.

The stage was set to rotate 180°, in 0.7° steps. Additional settings were varied, to optimise parameters for the type of sample being scanned (Table 2.1). Voltage determined the intensity of the x-ray beam, its penetration, and the contrast of the resultant image. Current determined the number of emitted x-ray photons and the brightness of the resultant image. Filters blocked low intensity x-rays when required, improving contrast and reducing noise.

The scan was started and as the stage rotated the camera captured an x-ray tomography projection image of the sample at each rotation step (Figure 2.6B). Scan time was dependent on the settings used and ranged from 10  minutes to several hours.

Funding

Wellcome Trust

EPSRC

British Heart Foundation

History

Ethics

  • There is no personal data or any that requires ethical approval

Policy

  • The data complies with the institution and funders' policies on access and sharing

Sharing and access restrictions

  • The data can be shared openly

Data description

  • The file formats are open or commonly used

Methodology, headings and units

  • Headings and units are explained in the files

Usage metrics

    Department of Mechanical Engineering

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC