The University of Sheffield
Browse

Comparison of statistical methods for analysing Short-Form 36 (SF-36) in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using standardised effect size (SES): an empirical analysis

Download (455.66 kB)
poster
posted on 2022-10-03, 15:57 authored by Yirui Qian, Richard JacquesRichard Jacques, Laura Flight, Stephen WaltersStephen Walters
<p>Poster presented at ICTMC 2022 conference. </p> <p><br></p> <p>This study aims to compare different methods for the analysis of the SF-36 domain scores in randomised controlled trials using standardised effect size to unify and compare their estimated values with evidence from empirical analyses. </p> <p><br></p> <p>The ethics approval for this secondary analysis of data was obtained from the University of Sheffield ScHARR Ethics Committee (Reference 036168).  </p>

Funding

NIHR (NF-SI-0617-10012)

China Scholarship Council (grant number 201908890049)

History

Ethics

  • The project has ethical approval and the number is included in the description field

Policy

  • The data complies with the institution and funders' policies on access and sharing

Sharing and access restrictions

  • The data can be shared openly

Data description

  • The file formats are open or commonly used

Methodology, headings and units

  • Headings and units are explained in the files

Usage metrics

    School of Health and Related Research

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC