Comparison of statistical methods for analysing Short-Form 36 (SF-36) in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using standardised effect size (SES): an empirical analysis
This study aims to compare different methods for the analysis of the SF-36 domain scores in randomised controlled trials using standardised effect size to unify and compare their estimated values with evidence from empirical analyses.
The ethics approval for this secondary analysis of data was obtained from the University of Sheffield ScHARR Ethics Committee (Reference 036168).
Funding
NIHR (NF-SI-0617-10012)
China Scholarship Council (grant number 201908890049)
History
Ethics
The project has ethical approval and the number is included in the description field
Policy
The data complies with the institution and funders' policies on access and sharing