Comparison of statistical methods for the analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) particularly the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using standardised effect size (SES): an empirical analysis
poster
posted on 2022-08-21, 18:41 authored by Yirui Qian, Richard JacquesRichard Jacques, Laura Flight, Stephen WaltersStephen Walters<p>Poster presented at the 43rd Annual Conference of the International Society for Clinical Biostatistics (ISCB). </p>
<p><br></p>
<p>This study aims to compare different methods for the analysis of the SF-36 domain scores in randomised controlled trials using standardised effect size to unify and compare their estimated values with evidence from empirical analyses.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>The ethics approval for this secondary analysis of data was obtained from the University of Sheffield ScHARR Ethics Committee (Reference 036168). </p>
Funding
China Scholarship Council
NIHR Senior Investigator Award (NF-SI-0617-10012)
History
Ethics
- The project has ethical approval and the number is included in the description field
Policy
- The data complies with the institution and funders' policies on access and sharing
Sharing and access restrictions
- The data can be shared openly
Data description
- The file formats are open or commonly used
Methodology, headings and units
- Headings and units are explained in the files
