Comparison of statistical methods for the analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) particularly the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using standardised effect size (SES) an empirical analys.pdf (1 MB)
Comparison of statistical methods for the analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) particularly the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using standardised effect size (SES): an empirical analysis
poster
posted on 2022-08-21, 18:41 authored by Yirui Qian, Richard JacquesRichard Jacques, Laura Flight, Stephen WaltersStephen WaltersPoster presented at the 43rd Annual Conference of the International Society for Clinical Biostatistics (ISCB).
This study aims to compare different methods for the analysis of the SF-36 domain scores in randomised controlled trials using standardised effect size to unify and compare their estimated values with evidence from empirical analyses.
The ethics approval for this secondary analysis of data was obtained from the University of Sheffield ScHARR Ethics Committee (Reference 036168).
Funding
China Scholarship Council
NIHR Senior Investigator Award (NF-SI-0617-10012)
History
Ethics
- The project has ethical approval and the number is included in the description field
Policy
- The data complies with the institution and funders' policies on access and sharing
Sharing and access restrictions
- The data can be shared openly
Data description
- The file formats are open or commonly used
Methodology, headings and units
- Headings and units are explained in the files
