The University of Sheffield
Browse
- No file added yet -

Comparison of statistical methods for the analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) particularly the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using standardised effect size (SES): an empirical analysis

Download (1 MB)
poster
posted on 2022-08-21, 18:41 authored by Yirui Qian, Richard JacquesRichard Jacques, Laura Flight, Stephen WaltersStephen Walters

Poster presented at the 43rd Annual Conference of the International Society for Clinical Biostatistics (ISCB). 


This study aims to compare different methods for the analysis of the SF-36 domain scores in randomised controlled trials using standardised effect size to unify and compare their estimated values with evidence from empirical analyses.


The ethics approval for this secondary analysis of data was obtained from the University of Sheffield ScHARR Ethics Committee (Reference 036168). 

Funding

China Scholarship Council

NIHR Senior Investigator Award (NF-SI-0617-10012)

History

Ethics

  • The project has ethical approval and the number is included in the description field

Policy

  • The data complies with the institution and funders' policies on access and sharing

Sharing and access restrictions

  • The data can be shared openly

Data description

  • The file formats are open or commonly used

Methodology, headings and units

  • Headings and units are explained in the files

Usage metrics

    Design, Trials and Statistics

    Categories

    Keywords

    Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs)Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)Statistical Analysis MethodsSF-36

    Licence

    CC BY 4.0

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC