Version 2 2025-11-26, 16:14Version 2 2025-11-26, 16:14
Version 1 2025-11-26, 10:23Version 1 2025-11-26, 10:23
report
posted on 2025-11-26, 16:14authored byJames Lomas, Francesco Longo, Andrea Salas-Ortiz, Karl Claxton
<p dir="ltr">In this paper, we address some of the key questions for health policy in England: i) can the NHS be regarded as underfunded; ii) what increase in overall NHS expenditure might be justified, and iii) how resources should be allocated across the NHS.</p><p dir="ltr">Using data from local areas of the NHS in England in 2016/17, and an econometric analysis using instrumental variables to estimate causal effects of health expenditures on health outcomes, we estimate the non-marginal effects of changes in total NHS expenditure based on a Cobb-Douglas production function and reflect the heterogeneity in effect sizes by local area using unconditional quantile regression.</p><p dir="ltr">Based on UK government estimates of the social value of health, we find that an increase in expenditure of £1,500 to £2,000 per capita would be justified by the scale of health benefits that would result. We also find that a statistically significant effect on overall health is possible following a re-allocation of existing resources.</p>
Funding
NIHR Policy Research Unit - Economic Methods of Evaluation in Health and Care Interventions
History
Methodology, headings and units
Headings and units are explained in the files
Policy
The data complies with the institution and funders' policies on access and sharing
Sharing and access restrictions
The uploaded data can be shared openly
Data description
The file formats are open or commonly used
Responsibility
The depositor is responsible for the content and sharing of the attached files
Ethics
There is no personal data or any that requires ethical approval