The University of Sheffield
Browse

Review of Systematic, Scoping and Other Reviews using the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework to understand barriers to implementation of eHealth: Scoping Review

Download (21 kB)
workflow
posted on 2024-07-29, 12:08 authored by Daniel HindDaniel Hind, Fenti Endriyani, Carla-Jane GirlingCarla-Jane Girling, Liz Pryde, Avril McCarthy, Lindsay Georgopolous

Background and RationaleE-health and m-health interventions show considerable promise for enhancing access to care, health outcomes, and service efficiency. However, there is often a mismatch between the tools developed and the needs and capabilities of intended users. Reviews have been conducted on implementing e-health and m-health innovations using the NASSS (Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability) framework to explore this challenge. The NASSS considers complex, multi-level factors across seven domains – condition, technology, value proposition, adopter system, organization, wider system, embedding over time – that influence whether these innovations get adopted in real-world settings.

As the number of reviews employing the NASSS framework grows, there is a need to map the evidence landscape regarding its application. Scoping reviews of reviews systematically search,screen, extract and summarize findings from published reviews on a topic to clarify concepts, consolidate knowledge and identify gaps. We will conduct a scoping review of reviews applying the NASSS framework to categorize determinants of e-health and m-health implementation. Although application is still early, at least 14 reviews using NASSS were published by the end of2022. A scoping review can determine what interventions, settings, stakeholders and NASSS domains have been examined so far, and where knowledge gaps persist.

Funding

Student dissertation

History

Ethics

  • There is no personal data or any that requires ethical approval

Policy

  • The data complies with the institution and funders' policies on access and sharing

Sharing and access restrictions

  • The uploaded data can be shared openly

Data description

  • The file formats are open or commonly used

Methodology, headings and units

  • Headings and units are explained in the files

Responsibility

  • The depositor is responsible for the content and sharing of the attached files

Usage metrics

    School of Health and Related Research

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC